Thursday, Citibank released a statement explaining their plan to curtail the second amendment protections of their customers and partners. It is not centered on an ideological mission to rid the world of firearms. That is not what we seek.
Arms and the Antebellum Experience a. Arms and the Southern Order p. A History Ignored Conclusion: Self-Defense and the Gun Control Question Today It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, It is a constitutional debate that has taken place largely in the absence of Supreme Court opinion.
The debate over the Second Amendment is ultimately part of the larger debate over gun control, a debate about the extent to which the Amendment was either meant to be or should be interpreted as limiting the ability of government to prohibit or limit private ownership of firearms.
Waged in the popular press,  in the halls of Congress,  and increasingly in historical and p. Advocates of stricter gun controls have tended to stress the Amendment's Militia Clause, arguing that the purpose of the Amendment was to ensure that state militias would be maintained against potential federal encroachment.
This argument, embodying the collective rights theory, sees the framers' primary, indeed sole, concern as one with the concentration of military power in the hands of the federal government, and the corresponding need to ensure a decentralized military establishment largely under state control.
They argue that, while maintaining a "well-regulated militia"  was the predominate reason for including the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights, it should not be viewed as the sole or p. They argue that the framers also contemplated a right to individual and community protection.
This debate has raised often profound questions, but questions generally treated hastily, if at all, by the community of constitutional scholars. If the Second Amendment was designed to ensure the existence of somewhat independent state militias immune from federal encroachment, then the question arises to what extent states are free to define militia membership.
Could a state include as members of its militia all adult citizens, thus permitting them an exemption from federal firearms restrictions?
If, instead, the federal government has plenary power to define militia membership and chooses to confine such membership to the federally controlled National Guard, does the Second Amendment become a dead letter under the collective rights theory? If the collective rights theory raises difficult questions, the individual rights theory raises perhaps even more difficult, and perhaps more interesting ones.
Some of these questions are obvious and frequently asked, such as where to draw the line between an individual's right to possess arms and the corollary right to self-defense on the one hand, and the community's interest in public safety and crime control on the other.
Other questions are more elusive, more difficult to pose as well as to answer. At the heart of the individual rights view is the contention that the framers of the Second Amendment intended to protect the right to bear arms for two related purposes.
The first of these was to ensure popular participation in the security of the community, an outgrowth of the English and early American reliance on posses and militias made up of the general citizenry to provide police and military forces. The framers had firsthand experience with such a phenomenon, but they lived in an age when the weapon likely to be found in private hands, the single shot musket or pistol, did not differ considerably from its military counterpart.
Although the armies of the day possessed heavier weapons rarely found in private hands, battles were fought predominately by infantry or cavalry with weapons not considerably different from those employed by private citizens for personal protection or hunting.
For individual rights theorists, this shift immediately raises the question of whether, given the tremendous changes that have occurred in weapons technology, the framers' presumed intention of enabling the population to resist tyranny remains viable in the modern world.
Where should the proper lines be drawn with respect to modern firearms, all of which employ technologies largely unimagined by the framers? In the eighteenth century, the chief vehicle for law enforcement was the posse comitatus, and the major American military force was the militia of the whole.
While these institutions are still recognized by modern law,  they lie dormant in late twentieth-century America. Professional police forces and a standing military p.
It is possible that the concept of a militia of the armed citizenry has been largely mooted by social change. Yet, the effect of social change on the question of the Second Amendment is a two-edged sword.
If one of the motivating purposes behind the Second Amendment was to provide a popular check against potential governmental excess, then does the professionalization of national and community security make the right to keep and bear arms even more important in the modern context?
Furthermore, the question remains whether the concept of a militia of the whole is worth re-examining: Did the framers, by adopting the Second Amendment, embrace a republican vision of the rights and responsibilities of free citizens that, despite the difficulties, should somehow be made to work today?
Finally, the Second Amendment debate raises important questions concerning constitutional interpretation, questions that need to be more fully addressed by legal historians and constitutional commentators.
It poses important questions about notions of the living Constitution, and to what extent that doctrine can be used to limit as well as extend rights. It also poses important questions about social stratification, cultural bias, and constitutional interpretation. Do courts really protect rights explicit or implicit in the Constitution, or is the courts' interpretation of rights largely a dialogue with the elite, articulate sectors of society, with the courts enforcing those rights favored by dominant elites and ignoring those not so favored?The Tax Protester FAQ Introduction What is the purpose of this FAQ?
The purpose of this FAQ is to provide concise, authoritative rebuttals to nonsense about the U.S. tax system that is frequently posted on web sites scattered throughout the Internet, by a variety of fanatics, idiots, charlatans, and dupes, frequently referred to by the courts as “tax protesters”.
Law and lawyer cartoons, written by a Harvard lawyer. Amendment to Contract. 1. This amendment (the "Amendment") is made by _____ and _____, parties to the agreement _____ dated (the "Agreement").
2. The Agreement is amended as follows: _____ 3. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement is unaffected and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
If . What are H3 Occupations? High Wage, High Skill and High Demand jobs are today's in-demand jobs.
|The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration||In the application of the provisions of this Law, the following terms shall mean: The Ministry of Social Affairs and Labor.|
|An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.||The Supreme Court Vs. The First Amendment Schenck v.|
|How to Write an Amendment to a Contract | benjaminpohle.com||Text[ edit ] There are several versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with capitalization or punctuation differences.|
|How to Write a Divorce Settlement Agreement (with Pictures)||Organizational and Consultant Conflict of Interest Comptroller General New OCI Waiver As discussed in our last decision, the record presented at that time showed that the agency had concerns about the activities of an individual identified as Mr. The agency expressed interest in Mr.|
|Second Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia||How to Write an Amendment to a Contract by Jayne Thompson - Updated September 26, When parties make a contract they can add to it or change by writing a legal addendum.|
Occupations are high wage when at least half of their wage measures are at or above the regional average for all occupations. Your Contract Amendment should include information like: the name of the original contract or agreement; the parties involved; the effective date of the amendment; the part of the contract being changed, added to, or deleted (be as specific as possible, listing specific subsections); and the nature of the change (an edit, deletion, or addition).
Tennessee Law Review; A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment, by Glenn Harlan Reynolds.