Hegemonic war theory and the intervention of the united states in vietnam

References and Further Reading 1. Introduction Historically, the just war tradition--a set of mutually agreed rules of combat—may be said to commonly evolve between two culturally similar enemies.

The end of the Cold War

American Democracy and Hegemony Introduction The United States was involved in the affairs of Vietnam long before its public, or even all of its government, was aware of a thing called the Vietnam War. Before the Tonkin Gulf Incident, Rolling Thunder, and all that came after and has been more extensively chronicled, the United States was involved.

The American representation of Vietnam and the war there, both then and since, has consisted of a collection "truths," which the nation believed to be self-evident. These "truths," however, were and are a part of a discourse of American Exceptionalism, one which the United States would use to reinforce the representation that it is a nation of "difference"; that is, that the United States is not a colonial power, not an oppressor, but a "helper," there to save those who cannot save themselves.

Since the American Revolution, which established independence from such a traditional colonial power, part of the American discourse has included this mission to "help" others in their struggles for freedom, democracy, and capitalism: The American rhetoric surrounding the War then, and now, presented the conflict in Vietnam in such altruistic terms.

Yet when one penetrates this rhetoric of "self-evident" truths and "obvious" facts, one can see this representation of history and politics as one that is not a self-evident or obvious truth, but rather a created truth, one inscribed upon the people of the United States.

These "truths" are not neutral knowledges placed before people to be freely absorbed or ignored as part of a conscious decision, but rather information which is part of a complex, interwoven scheme: The Vietnam War is special precisely because it exposes this hegemonic discourse; what is usually invisible, the apparatuses supporting it hidden, this horrible conflict made conspicuous, temporarily dispelling an illusionary framework and revealing these "truths" to be something not nearly as self-evident as the U.

This visibility is at its apex in observing how the United States approached both the Vietnamese nation and their people during the Vietnam War.

Part I Most of U. It was from this fear that belief in the "Domino Theory" arose: Legitimate ends, however, are not the same thing as legitimate means; nor do they preclude other illegitimate ends.

The United States also indicated that it wanted "U. According to this document, America was also working with France, which, at that time, was openly the type of imperial power that American discourse allegedly opposes.

This raises the questions of how far the United States was willing to go to stop communism and at what price?

Hell & Israel: Après Lavrov le deluge

Despite this and other similar rhetoric, U. Ultimately, The United States allowed itself to oppose the French in more ways than one. This allowed America to reap the benefit of saying that it would not help a colonial power subjugate a foreign people, and able it to claim distance from the French situation.

The French were to be kept as friendly allies in the process.

When contacted by France in Aprilin dire need of direct military assistance, a cable from U. Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, made it clear that: Indeed, what was more important, was what was not said by the Americans.armed force by the United States since the Vietnam war.

It is the first major post-Cold- 2 Theories of Conflict and the Iraq War Table 1: Summary of Explanatory Perspectives on the Iraq Invasion Theory Causal/explanatory focus Realism Unipolarity, maintain hegemony and avoid post-9/11 decline by demonstrating U.S.

willingness to use force. The Neocons are in, Rex Tillerson is out. He didn’t quite fit. An Exxon man with a Texas accent—who never ’shticked’ with the Jewish clique—was a mishap waiting to happen.

Pompeo’s now in, a Harvard boy, who touts the right script. [Clip: “And, we are back on the air right now because.

the plutocracy cartel an entrenched global elite of vast wealth has spread its tentacles over the earth wielding extraordinary power over world affairs.

There is a Cancer in the Land, and It is Global Zionism Global Zionism has Taken Over the Government, the Media, the Military, Higher Education, Politics, Law, and the Banks. Start studying Brinkmanship and Vietnam.

The Whole Truth

Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Why was the United States concerned about Vietnam during the s?

Hegemonic blackmail: entrapment in civil war intervention. Hegemonic blackmail: entrapment in civil war intervention Full Article such as Britain’s steadfast refusal to join the United States in Vietnam. As the war in Iraq showed, alliance ties might not be sufficient to either compel small states to join an unwanted intervention. Oct 12,  · North and South Vietnam; What Is the Domino Theory? During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship. Definition. In defining Grand Strategy, military historian B. H. Liddell Hart states: [T]he role of grand strategy – higher strategy – is to co-ordinate and direct all the resources of a nation, or band of nations, towards the attainment of the political object of the war – the goal defined by fundamental policy.

Which of the following most contributed to Ho Chi Minh's campaign in the conflict with France following World War II? During the Cold War Era, the United States vastly expanded its military capacity; The Pro’s argument is based on a theory of sovereignty that is already violated in most of the conflicts in which the US interferes.

The Pro’s arguments point to failed or misguided intervention in Vietnam, Chile, Somalia, Lebanon, Grenada, Libya, and.